) RECE o 258 OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION NUCLEAR DIVISION for the U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ORNL- TM- 2304 “@S\W MSRE DESIGN AND OPERATIONS REPORT Part XI-A Test Program for 233y Operation J. R. Engel NOTICE This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is subject to revision or correction and therefore does not represent a final report. GISTRIBUTLION Qf THIS DCCUMENT I8 INOTMITER, LEGAL NOTICE -—-—n e This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work, Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any persoa acting on behaolf of the Commission: A, Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accurecy, completeness, or usefulness of the informotion contained in this report, or that the use of any information, opparctus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. As used in the cbove, ‘“‘person acting on beholf af the Commission’” includes any employese or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such centractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or ! I i provides access to, any informatien pursuant to his employment or contract with the Commission, or his employment with such contractor. ORNL-TM-230k4 Reactor Division MSRE DESIGN AND OPERATIONS REPORT Part XI-A Test Program for 37U Operation J. R. Engel SEPTEMBER 1968 LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work, Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any persou acting on behalf of the Commission: A, Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accu- racy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. As used in the above, ‘‘person acting on behalf of the Cominission® includes any em- ployee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or provides access to, any information pursuant to his employment or contract with the Commission, or his employment with such contractor, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee Operated by UNION CARBITE CORPORATION for the U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION g = o iii CONTENTS PREFACE . INTRODUCTION. v « v v v v o o o o v v v o o o o & OBTECTIVES. « ¢ v v v v v v o e v o e e e e e e e v e u BASIC NUCLEAR TESTS v v v « o o o v v o o o o v e e u 233y Critical Experiment . . v v v v v v v v 4 . . . Preparations for Fuel Loading . . . . . 2337 Loading SEqUEnce . . .« + « v . o . . . . Control-Rod Calibration Other Basic Nuclear Parameters 233] Concentration Coefficient of Reactivity. Isothermal Temperature Coefficient of Reactivity. Power Coefficient of Reactivity . . . . . . . . REACTOR OPERATION WITH 33U FUEL. . . Power Calibration. . . . « . « . « « + « v « o . . . Control Systems Tests. . . ¢« v ¢ ¢« o ¢ ¢ ¢« & ¢« o o« Reactor Dynamics . ¢« « . ¢ ¢« & ¢ o o & Reactivity Balance . . . . & ¢ ¢ ¢ v o« o o o o o o Application of Noise Analysis. . . « + « ¢« « o & Measurement of 222U Capture to Fission Ratio . . CHEMICAL, AND MATERTAL STUDIES IN THE FUEL ILOOP. . . . Surveillance of Corrosion and Salt Contamination . Surveillance of Uranium Inventory. Fission-Product Behavior . . ¢ « ¢« ¢« & ¢ ¢« o o « + & Graphite and Hastelloy Surveillance. . . . . . . . . - Ay, o }’(% O WO WO O O w w N« H o R E E R R OE R F R oUW DR OO O PREFACE This report is one of a series that describes the design and opera- tion of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment. All the reports have been issued with the exceptions noted. ORNL-TM-T728 +* ORNL-TM-T729 ORNL-TM-T730 ORNL~TM-T31" " ORNL-TM-732 ORNL-TM-2111 ORNL-TM-T733 ORNL-TM-90T MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part I, Description of Reactor Design by R. C. Robertson MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part IIT, Muclear and Process Instrumentation, by J. R. Tallackson MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part I1I, Nuclear Analysis, by P. N. Haubenreich, J. R. Engel, B. E. Prince, and H. C. Claiborne MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part IV, Chemistry and Materials, by F. F. Blankenship and A. Taboada MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part V, Reactor Safety Analysis Report, by S. E. Beall, P. N. Haubenreich, R. B. Lindauer, and J. R. Tallackson MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part V-4, Safety Analysis of Operation with 27U, by P. N. Haubenreich, J. R. Engel, C. H. Gabbard, R. H. Guymon, and B, E. Prince MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part VI, Operating Limits, by S. E. Beall and R. H. Guymon MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part VII, Fuel Handling and Processing Plant, by R. B. Lindauer * Part of this report, IT-A, has been issued; the remainder is in process. ¥% These reports will not be issued. ORNL-TM-908 ORNL-TM-909 ORNL-TM-910 ORNL-TM-911 ORNL-TM-2304 vi MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part VIII, Operating Procedures, by R. H. Guymon MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part IX, Safety Procedures and Emergency Plans, by A, N. Smith MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part X, Maintenance Equipment and Procedures, by E. C. Hise and R. Blumberg MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part XI, Test Program, by R. H. Guymon, P. N. Haubenreich, and J. R. Engel MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part XI-A, Test Progrsm for =°°U Operation, by J. R. Engel MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part XIT, Lists: Drawings, Specifications, Line Schedules, Instrument Tabulations (Vol. 1 and 2) These reports will not be issued. INTRODUCTION The initial critical operation of the MSRE with #25U occurred on June 1, 1965. The reactor was subsequently operated at various powers up to 8 Mw for sustained periods and accumulated a total of 9005 equiva- lent full-power hours with that fuel. The reactor loop was drained on March 29, 1968 and preparations were started to replace the 23°U-27gg mixture in the fuel salt with #>2U. The test program that was conducted with the ©35U ig described in Reference 1. The purpose of this memo is to outline the program that is to be followed with the 2337 loading. OBJECTIVES Since the MSRE will be the first reactor to be fuelled completely with 223U, there will be considerable interest in the initial critical experiment. This experiment will provide additional data on the ade- quacy of the calculational techniques used to predict the critical uranium concentration in the MSRE. Comparison of the results with those of the 23U critical experiment will also provide some indirect evidence about the quality of the input nuclear data used for 33U, In addition to the initial critical concentration, we will measure other basic nuclear parameters of the system with 2337 fuel ~— temperature and uranium- concentration coefficients of reactivity, reactivity effects of fuel circulation, and control-rod reactivity worth. In each case comparisons will be made with the predicted values. After the zero-power experiments, we will continue our studies of the overall nuclear performance of the MSRE. Some changes, due to the 233U, are expected in the long-term reactivity behavior and in the dy- namic response of the reactor. Extensive investigations will be carried out in both these areas to compare the predicted and observed behavior. 1R. H. Guymon, P. N, Haubenreich, and J. R. Engel, MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part XI, Test Program, USAEC Report ORNL-TM-911, Oak Ridge National ILaboratory, November 1966, In addition, we plan to use neutron fluctuation spectra as an operational diagnostic aid. Some useful correlations were developed during the 235y operation and it may be practical to use similar correlations to monitor reactor performance. Of particular interest in the area of performance tests will be a special experiment to measure the effective neutron yield for 33U in a molten salt reactor neutron spectrum. Studies of reactor chemistry and materials behavior will be con- tinued throughout the operation of the reactor system. Data will be gathered on our ability to accurately monitor uranium inventory at low concentrations as well as on the behavior of fission and corrosion pro- ducts. The studies of the effects of exposing graphite and metal to fuel salt, fission products, and radiation will also be continued. The =3?U fuel mixture will probably be used for all the remaining operation of the MSRE. However, consideration is currently being given to an interruption of that operation to permit substitution of a less expensive secondary salt (sodium fluoroborate) for the LiF-BeF- mixture in the system to demonstrate its operating characteristics. Since this change is still being studied, the test program for that phase of opera- tion will be defined later. BASTC NUCLEAR TESTS In addition to providing a check on the calculational techniques used to predict the properties of the MSRE with 233y fuel, measurements of these basic properties will supply much of the data that is required for monitoring the subsequent behavior of the reactor. The on-line reactivity-balance calculation requires, as input information, data on control-rod worth, and various coefficients of reactivity. Where possible, results of direct measurements of these properties will be used. In other cases, (e.g. fission-product effects) calculated values will be employed., Direct comparisons of calculated and observed values will be useful in establishing confidence in quantities that cannot be measured. 2337 Critical Experiment Essentially all of the original uranium will be removed from that portion of the fuel salt that is fluorinated. However, a small heel of fuel salt (containing about 1.2 kg of the total U) will be left in a fuel drain tank when the salt is transferred to the fuel storage tank for processing. This uranium will be mixed with the fuel carrier salt before the #23y critical experiment is started. Most of the plutonium and many of the non-volatile fission products (notably samarium) that were produced in the 235y operation will remain in the salt for the 22U operation. Thus, the £33y critical experiment will not be ''clean'" and corrections for the effects of these contaminants will have to be made when the re- sults are evaluated. Except for a practice addition of about 0.8 kg of 238U,* all of the uranium that is added in the critical experiment will have the isotopic composition listed in Table 1. This uranium is available as the eutectic salt mixture LiF-UFy (73 - 27 mole %) in special cans containing up to 7 kg of total U. As in the initial %75U critical experiment, most of the uranium will be added to the fuel salt in a drain tank (FD-2). At ap- propriate intervals the reactor will be filled with the salt mixture to follow the subcritical multiplication as the uranium concentration is increased. After the fourth fill, the concentration will be close to the critical value and subsequent uranium additions will be made with capsules through the sampler-enricher to make the reactor critical. Preparations for Fuel Loading Since the 237U mixture is heavily contaminated with ©>2U and the last chemical purification of the uranium occurred some L4 years ago, the enriching salt contains substantial amounts of the daughter products of 238y decay. Several of these daughters are strong emitters of both alphas * The 28U is added to adjust the isotopic composition of the mixture for convenience in evaluating "alpha" for 233y later in the operation of the reactor. Table 1 Isotopic Composition of £>°Feed Material Abundance U_Isotope (atom %) 232 0.022 233 91.49 234 7.6 235 0.7 236 0.05 238 0.1k and gammas, making the cans of salt strong neutron (fiom a,n reactions in fluorine and lithium) and gamma radiation sources. 1In addition, the carrier salt, to which the uranium must be added, is highly radiocactive, although it will contain essentially no volatile fission products. These considerations require that shielded equipment be used for the uranium additions to the drain tanks. Special charging equipment, using shielded, remote-maintenance components, has been built and installed above fuel- drain-tank No, 2 (FD-2), as shown in Fig. 1. This equipment permits the transfer of single cans of enriching salt (containing no more than 7 kg of U) from the shielded transport cask into the drain tank under shielded, controlled-ventilation conditions. The empty cans are stored on a turntable within the equipment for removal as & group at the end of the drain-tank loading operations. The nuclear reactivity of a drain tank containing 2330 fuel will be somewhat higher than the same drain tank containing the 2357238y mixture. Although the drain tank is expected to be far suberitical under all normal storage conditions, careful observations will be made during the fuel ad- ditions to ensure that criticality is not approached in the tank. To accomplish this, two neutron-sensitive chambers — a sensitive BFs cham- ber and an insensitive fission chamber to cover a wide range of counting rates — will be installed just outside the drain tank for the loading ORNL-DWG 68-967 ———TURF CARRIER GRAPHITE SAMPLING SHIELD PURGE GAS ) SUPPLY -~ 2 &4 ‘ ‘ . 3 Nl Sy N ~ o N TOOL EXTENSION | M SEALS ~ h N L | 4y |7 # _ MAINTENANCE SH|£LD;-§< 77 D e ) = o oW~ TURNTABLE AND 7 WL : > ~ HIGH EFFICIENCY FILTER STORAGE WELLS AP P w// JT oy T TEXHAUST BLOWER CONTAINMENT ENCLOSURE E 1 AND STANDPIPE ASSEMBLY AL /e 7/ i/ A . ' 3 - J { -»::} _—FDT ACCESS FLANGE FOT Fig. 1. Arrangement for Adding 233y Enriching Salt to Fuel Drain Tank. operations. Since the fuel itself is an intense ((-n) neutron source, no external source will be required for neutron monitoring. Neutron counting to observe the progress of subcritical multipli- cation with the fuel in the reactor will be accomplished with the normal reactor instrumentation in the nuclear-instrument penetration. For the suberitical conditions we will use the high-sensitivity BF=s chamber and the two movable fission chambers. Since the reactor cell will be covered during the entire experiment, it will not be possible to install extra chambers around the core. For the same reason the external neutron source will remain fixed in the thermal shield throughout the experiment. However, the intense internal neutron source will completely overshadow the external source so that a movable source is of little value in this experiment. 233 Loading Sequence The bulk of the =33y enriching salt will be added to the fuel carrier salt through the special equipment attached to FD-2. We anticipate adding about 3k kg of total U in L4 major steps. The first two rounds of ad- ditions will consist of 21 and 7 kg U, respectively, and the subsequent additions will be based on extrapolations of count-rate ratios obtained from the preceding additions with the salt in the reactor. The objective is to bring the uranium loading to within 1/2 kg of critical in this manner. The enriching salt is available in cans of various sizes so that arbitrary amounts can be added in 1/2-kg increments. The final uranium additions will be made to the circulating loop in 98-gram increments through the sampler-enricher. The initial charging operation will require the addition of three T-kg cans of uranium to FD-2. These cans will be delivered to the re- actor site individually, in a shielded cask and inserted into the charging equipment., The cans are designed to be remotely suspended in the gas space of FD-2 above the liquid carrier salt. 1In this position the en- riching salt will slowly melt and drip into the carrier salt below it. During this time the can will be suspended from a weighing device so that progress of the melting can be followed. (Gross and tare weights of each can of salt will be available in advance.) At the same time we will observe the increase in neutron count rate as the neutron source and sub- critical multiplication increase. If the count rate increases too rapidly, the can can be withdrawn to slow or stop the uranium addition. After the addition, the empty can will be weighed more accurately, to ensure that it is empty, and stored on the turntable for later disposal. Prior to the addition of each can of enriching salt, one-half of the carrier salt will be transferred to the adjacent fuel drain tank (FD-1) to provide room for suspending the cans without contacting the salt. After the addition of each can, the remaining salt will be returned to FD-2 for mixing and to provide neutron count-rate data on the full tank. Extrapo- lations of ratios of these count rates will be used in conjunction with observations during additions to ensure that the drain tank remains sub- critical. After the addition of the first can of U, the transfers to FD-1 will also remove some uranium to keep X pp Very low during subse- gquent additions. After three cans of enriching salt (2l-kg U) have been added in this manner, the mixed fuel salt will be loaded into the reactor. Neutron count rates will be measured with the salt at several levels in the re- actor vessel to ensure that criticality is not attained before the vessel is full. (During salt additions, as in all filling operations, the three control rods will be partly withdrawn so that they can suppress any pre- mature criticality and initiate a salt drain,) Additional count-rate data will be obtained before, during, and after circulation of the salt in the loop. These data will be used for extrapolations to the pro- Jjected critical loading. Since the 22U mixture provides such an intense internal neutron source, count rates with the external source and no fuel are of little value in this critical experiment. Therefore, the data obtained from the first loop fill with uranium-bearing salt will be used as a basis for the usual inverse-count-rate plots. Thus two loadings of predeter- mined size (21-kg and T-kg) are required before extrapolations can be made to establish the size of subsequent loadings. The procedures described above will be carried out three more times (with different numbers and sizes of E33y-salt cans) to bring the reactor system within l/2—kg of the critical loading. After the fourth loop fill, the salt will remain in the loop and 98-gram additions of uranium will be made through the sampler-enricher to make the reactor just criti- cal at 1200°F with the fuel stationary and all control rods fully with- drawvn. The fuel salt will then be left in the loop for the remainder of the zero-power and low-power tests. Control-Rod Calibration Although there will be no change in the basic configuration of the reactor, the control rods in the MSRE will have about 30% more reactivity worth with Z3%U fuel than with the original loading. Therefore, a com- plete recalibration of the rods will be required before the reactor can be returned to full operation. The basic approach to be used for this work will be the same as that used for the original calibration.®,” The fundamental measurements to be made are the differential worth of one rod as a function of position with the other two rods withdrawn to their upper limits. These measurements will use the rod-bump period technique with the fuel salt stationary. The various critical positions of the control rod in question will be obtained by adding uranium to the salt to increase the amount of rod insertion., Since uranium can only be added in increments of 98 grams, each capsule will increase the fuel reactivity by about 0.12% 5k/k, so about 24 capsules will be needed to produce full insertion of one rod. As a conseguence, rod sensitivity measurements will be made after at least every second capsule addition. ZB. E. Prince et al., Zero-Power Physics Experiments on the Molten- Salt Reactor Experiment, USAEC Report ORNL-4233, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, February 1968, pp 11 - 37. °B. E. Prince, Period Measurements on the Molten Salt Reactor Experi- ment during Fuel Circulation: Theory and Experiment, USAEC Report ORNIL-TM-1626, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, October 1966 Measurements may be made after each addition in regions where the rod worth is changing rapidly. Integration of the differential-worth data will then provide a curve of reactivity as a function of position for one control rod. The bagic data will be supplemented by differential-worth measure- ments with the fuel circulating, rod-shadowing measurements, and rod-drop experiments to provide information on the reactivity worth of all three rods as a function of configuration. All of the data will be used to evaluate coefficients in a theoretically derived expression of rod worth that is amenable to evaluation by a digital computer. This expression will then be used (as it was during the £35y operation) by the on-line computer to calculate control-rod poisoning from the positions of the three rods. Other Basic Nuclear Parameters 233 Concentration Coefficient of Reactivity As excess 237U is added to the loop to bring the concentration to the operating value and calibrate the control rods, data will be col- lected to evaluate the reactivity effect of the excess uranium. These data will be reduced to a uranium-concentration coefficiént of reactivity to be used in evaluating the effects of burnup and subsequent fuel additions. Tsothermal. Temperature Coefficient of Reactivity When the initial set of fuel additions has been completed, an experi- ment will be performed to measure the isothermal temperature coefficient of reactivity of the reactor. In this experiment the fuel loop tempera- ture will be slowly varied between about 1150°F and 1225°F while the control-rod configuration required to keep the reactor just critical 1is recorded. The observed reactivity change will be corrected for any ef- fects due to changes in the circulating void fraction with temperature to obtain the total (fuel + graphite) temperature coefficient of reac- tivity. 10 Power Coefficient of Reactivity In the MSRE, a power coefficient of reactivity is used to describe the reactivity effect of the change in steady-state temperature distri- bution in the core that accompanies a change in power level, The value of this coefficient depends on the mode of temperature control (the re- actor outlet temperature is held constant on this reactor) and the magni- tudes of the separate fuel and graphite temperature coefficients of re- activity. Since the detailed temperature distribution in the core cannot be measured directly, the power coefficient will be inferred from the observed change in control-rod configuration with power after steady- state temperatures are achieved and before there has been a significant change in fission-product poisons. Observations will be made at several levels during the approach to full power to obtain a best value. REACTOR OPERATION WITH 33U FUEL After the initial tests to investigate the physics of the MSRE with 233U, the reactor wlll be operated at power to continue the studies of its long-term behavior. Some special tests will be required to prepare for extended operation and others will be used to demonstrate the con- tinuing satisfactory performance. Power Calibration The instantaneous indication of reactor power for the servo control and safety instruments is derived from neutron-sensitive chambers in the nuclear instrument penetration. Since the ratio of power level to neu- tron flux in the penetration may change with the new fuel, all the chanm- bers will be repositioned as required to eliminate any inconsistencies. The reference standard for repositioning the chambers will be the heat- power of the reactor calculated by the on-line computer from overall system heat balances. FEach of the compensated and uncompensated ion chambers will be individually positioned to give a direct readout of re- actor thermal power. In the case of the wide-range counting channels it may be necessary to modify the function generators that operate on 1l chamber position to obtain consistency over the entire power range. After all the chambers have been shifted, they will be rechecked to elimi- nate any mutual shadowing effects. Special precautions will be observed in moving the uncompensated chambers that serve as inputs to the flux safety system. Only one chamber at a time will be moved under strict administrative control and the other two chambers will be watched carefully to ensure that they are not ad- versely affected by the one that is moved. Control Systems Tests The reactor control systems (flux, temperature, and load) were tested under a variety of conditions with 235U fuel to demonstrate their ade- quacy.? A similar series of tests will be performed with the 37U fuel. However, this time the main emphasis will be on the reactor servo con- troller, flux servo at low power and temperature servo at powers above 1 Mw. (The load-control system will not be affected by the change in fuel.) Both the steady-state behavior and the response to perturbations will be examined. Calculations, analog-simulator studies, and measure- ments on the MSRE indicated that, at most, the high~frequency gain of the flux servo may have to be adjusted slightly for satisfactory performance with 23%U. (Reference 5) If such changes are made, the pertinent tests will be repeated to demonstrate the adequacy of the final system. 4R. H. Guymon, P, N. Haubenreich, J. R. Engel, MSRE Design and Operations Report, Part XI, Test Program, USAEC Report ORNL-TM-911, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, November 1966, pp. 5-2 to 5-3. S0ak Ridge National Laboratory, MSRP Semiann. Progr. Rept. February 1968, USAEC Report ORNL-425k4, in preparation. 12 Reactor Dynamics The dynamic behavior of the MSRE with #°°U fuel was the subject of extensive theoretical and experimental investigation.®»7 A comparable theoretical analysis of the dynamics with 23] has been performed and the results indicate that the reactor will be inherently stable at all powers.® The purpose of the dynamics tests is to provide another veri- fication of the calculational techniques. As with the ®7°U operation, various dynamic tests will be performed at zero power and during the approach to full power, Follow-up tests at power will be performed periodically to prove the persistence of proper behavior. In general, the tests will include pulse and step reactivity perturbations with a control rod as well as pseudorandom binary and ternary perturbations of control-rod position and fiux demand. Reactivity Ralance Reactor operation with 235 demonstrated the utility of an on-line reactivity balance as an operating guide.® The same type of calculation, with appropriate changes in coefficients, will be used during the £33 operation. Detailed experiments during the last operation with 235y showed that the current calculation does not adequately treat the xenon poison- ing. Veariations in system temperature and pressure induce changes in xenon poisoning by affecting the effectiveness of the gas stripper. ©5. J. Ball and T. W. Kerlin, Stability Analysis of the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment, USAEC Report ORNL-TM-1070, Oak Ridge National Labora- tory, December 1965. 7T. W. Kerlin and S. J. Ball, Experimental Dynemic Analysis of the Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment, USAEC Report ORNL-TM-1647, Oak Ridge National Iaboratory, October 13, 1966. S0ak Ridge National Laboratory, MSRP Semiann. Progr. Rept. Aug. 31, 1967, USAEC Report ORNL-5191, pp 61 - 62, °J. R. Fngel and B. E. Prince, The Reactivity Balance in the MSRE, USAEC Report ORNL-TM-1796, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, March 10, 1967. 13 These changes are of secondary interest in the MSRE because most of the reactor operation is at a fixed temperature and pressure. However, since a detailed understanding of the xenon behavior is important to the breeder programs, an attempt will be made during the 23U operation to modifly the mathematical model to incorporate temperature and pressure effects. It may be necessary to conduct additional experiments to supple- ment the available data in order to accomplish this improvement. Application of Noise Analysis In the course of operating the MSRE with £75U, a large amount of data was collected on the spectral density of the inherent neutron-level fluctuations in the reactor. Evaluation of these data indicates that changes in the flux 'moise™ spectrum are a good qualitative indication of changes in the circulating void fraction in the fluid fuel. Neutron noise data will be collected routinely to monitor this aspect of reactor operation and to look for any other changes in system performance. At- tempts will also be made to make the void indication more quantitative. Techniques have been developed to use the BR-340 computer at the reactor site to collect neutron-noise data (with all other computer functions inhibited) and process it immediately thereafter (with all other functions active). Thus, spectral-density results can be made availlable with very little delay for use as an operating guide if satisfactory correlations are developed. The same techniques may be used to monitor the vibration spectra from mechanical components if adequate data samples can be obtained. Measurement of 227y Capture to Fission Ratio An important factor in the breeding performance of molten salt re- actors is the ratio of parasitic neutron captures to fissions ("alpha') in ®37U in the reactor neutron spectrum. In current reactor design cal- culations, this ratio is obtained, in effect, by integrating differ- ential cross sections over the neutron-energy spectrum. A precise measurement of the integral value of "alpha' in a neutron spectrum typi- cal of moliten-salt reactors could reduce the uncertainty in the breeding 1h performance of new core designs., Since the neutron spectrum in the MSRE A with 223U fuel is very similar to that in the proposed breeders, a pre- cise measurement of "alpha' will be made during the 233y operation. The ? measurement consists of precise uranium isotopic assays before and after substantial 223U burnup. The value of "alpha" is derived from the build- up of 234U relative to the depletion of =>7U. CHEMICAL AND MATERIAL STUDIES IN THE FUEL LOOP A major objective in the operation of the MSRE is to study the be- havior of the basic materials — molten salt, graphite, and Hastelloy-N — in combination in a radiation enviromment. These studles are accomplished primarily through the examination of samples of the appropriate materials. A high level of effort will be maintained in this area throughout the operation of the reactor. Surveillance of Corrosion and Salt Contamination The most direct monitor of Hastelloy-N corrosion that is readily available in the MSRE is the level of chromium in the fuel salt, Chro- mium, leached from the surface of the metal remains in solution in the salt where its concentration can be measured in samples. In the first three years of reactor operation, the chromium in the fuel salt increased from ~ 38 ppm to ~ 80 ppm. If this is interpreted in terms of uniform attack on the fuel loop the increase represents leaching from less than j 0.3 mil of metal. This low rate of attack is expected to continue but | salt samples will be analyzed regularly to detect any changes. The processing of the fuel salt to remove the #°°U will require the establishment of a new baseline of chromium concentration. Fluorination of the salt in the fuel storage tank will substantially increase the Cr (also Fe and Ni) level. However, most of this will be reduced to free metal and filtered out in subsequent steps before the processed fuel is returned to the drain tanks. The resultant chromium concentration will be measured in samples taken at the start of the Z°7U operation. 15 Another salt contaminant that is carefully monitored is oxygen. The oxide tolerance of the MSRE fuel mixture is ~ 700 parts per million but observed concentrations have been around 50 - 60 ppm. Samples will be analyzed regularly to ensure that oxygen intrusion remains at a low level. Surveillance of Uranium Inventory The chemical concentration of uranium in the fuel salt for the 23°U operation was about L4.6% by weight. At this level the standard deviation of all the uranium chemical analyses was 0.02 wt.%.* The average ana- lytical concentration at the end of that operation was such that the apparent uranium inventory was within 200 gm (out of 222 kg) of the book inventory derived from known additions and depletions. In the 237Q operation, the chemical uranium concentration will be only about 0.7 Wt%. It appears that average values of analytical results will provide the necessary data for precise, long-term comparisons of "book" and observed uranium inventory. However, improvements in pre- cision are under development and will be required to permit short-term comparisons using individual results. In general, reactivity-balance results will be used in conjunction with the uranium analytical results to monitor the short-term behavior of the system. Fission-Product Behavior Several aspects of fission-product behavior are of particular interest in the MSRE. These include the deposition of noble-metal species on graphite and Hastelloy surfaces, the escape of some noble metals as "smoke'" or "dust" in the reactor offgas, and the escape of other volatile species (Xe, Kr, Te, etc.). Much information has been collected about the behavior of fission products in this system but more is required for a thorough understanding and evaluation, Therefore, considerable effort will be expended during * The relative precision, AC/c is %% or 0.4, 16 the remaining operation of the reactor in analyzing the fuel salt and reactor offgas to elucidate the fisslon product behavior. To aid in this effort special samples of salt and cover gas will be withdrawn through the fuel sampler. In addition, use will be made of the offgas sampler and of special instrumentation and collection devices installed in the reactor offgas line at the fuel pump. Selected specimens of metal and graphite that are exposed in the reactor core will be examined to provide more data on fission-product plateout on surfaces and in- trusion into graphite. The circumstances under which various samples must be obtained will, to some extent, influence the power operation of the reactor. For ex- ample, it may be desirable to take some samples while the fuel salt is stationary, in which case the reactor must be at zero power., In other cases, prolonged operation at power will be required to reach steady- state conditions with regard to particular fission products. A complete shutdown will be required to remove specimens from the core or the off- gas line, Graphite and Hastelloy Surveillance Graphite and Hastelloy surveillance specimens are exposed to fuel salt in the MSRE core and other Hastelloy specimens are suspended just outside the reactor vessel., The primary purpose of these specimens is to study radiation and salt-exposure effects under reactor conditions; however, they have also been used in connection with some of the fission- product studies. Selected specimens are removed for examination at approximately six-month intervals and replaced with new ones. Since such changes are major operations, they are normally scheduled to coincide with other major reactor shutdowns. The first sets of samples installed in the MSRE were representative of materials actually used in the construction of the reactor system. Since that time continued development effort has led to other graphites of interest and to minor changes in the composition of Hastelloy-N, Conse- quently, subsequent arrays have included samples of some of these materials, This surveillance program is expected to continue for the operating life of the reactor. O -3 OV W P o - - » . . - PENOQEUUPUEYE MR G SN SQORD YOO Q O HEnnQY9deT 17 Internal Distribution Adams Affel Apple Asquith Baes Ball . Beall Bender S. Bettis F. Blankenship Blumberg Bohlmann Borkowski . Boyd Briggs Bryan Chandler Chapman Clark Clifford Cook Corbin Cottrell Crowley Culler, Jr. Davis Ditto Doss Eatherly Engel Epler Ferguson Fraas Fry Frye, Jr. Friedman Gabbard Gallaher . Grimes Grindell Bk 0 Q) s QUEmrmErEYYYPOQRE DN EDE R E SR L1, L2, 43, Ly-L48, Lg, 50. 51. 52. 53. 5k, 55. 56. o O™ N f-—lfaWF?PF??OEFFEOWF}?ZWQWQD>UJC)I—I]'.:I:1"UCQSE|!—:I§J>"U"U*U';Utl:l ORNL-TM-230k Gupton Guymon . Harley Haubenreich . Herndon outzeel Hudson Johnson Jordan Kaplan Kasten . Kedl . Kerlin Kern Kirslis Krakoviak Krewson Kryter . Lane Lindauer Lundin Lyon MacPherson MacPherson Martin Mauney McCoy MeCurdy McDuffie MeGlothlan Miller Moore Nicholson . Oakes Perry Piper . Prince Ragan . Redford = o 2:&+gikin:uih:ncn 4 - £ Mtfii§<3F*?4C4?¢F1CJE1F1CiM§QEZIHlfi = Qo HWn . Richardson 18 Internal Distribution (continued) 85. R. C. Robertson 102. R. C. Steffy 86, J (. Robinson 103, H. H. Stone 87-91., M. W. Rosenthal 104, J. R. Tallackson 92. A. W. Savolainen 105. R. E., Thoma 93, Dunlap Scott 106, D. G. Trauger 94, J. H. Shaffer 107. C. 8. Walker 95, E. G. Silver 108. B. H. Webster 96, M. J. Skinner 109. A. M. Weinberg 97. A. N. Smith 110. J. R. Welr 98. 0. L. Smith 111, K. W. West 99. P. G. Smith 112. M. E, Whatley 100. I. Spiewak 113. J. C. White 101. D. A, Sundberg 114. G. D. Whitman 115. Gale Young 116-117. Central Research Library (CRL) 118-119. Y-12 Document Reference Section (DRS) 120-149. ILaboratory Records Department (LRD) 150. ILaboratory Records, (LRD-RC) Fxternal Distribution 151-152. T. W. McIntosh, AEC, RDT, Washington, D. C. 20545 153, H. M. Roth, Laboratory and University Division, ORO 15h, T. G. Schleiter, AEC, RDT, Washington, D. C. 20545 155, Milton Shaw, AEC, RDT, Washington, D. C. 20545 156-170. Division of Technical Information Extension, (DTIE)